Cases 11 - 20 of 73
MALARIK et al v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00780
Defendant:
IZZAT-AL DOUN-BAUTH PARTY OF IRAQ, ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH DIOCEASE OF PITTSBURGH, CHRIS ISLAM OF NIGERIA and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS, Sr., ERNEST POOH THORTON and JAMES M. WHITEY BULGER MAFIA MALARIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ketchup v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv04517
Defendant:
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc., W. Mackelburg, D. Baysore and others
Plaintiff:
Iran Dwayne Ketchup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Asemani v. The Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv00454
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran
Plaintiff:
Billy G Asemani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Women in Beiruit Lebanon and Lebanon et al v. Lebanon Explosion et al
as 2:2020cv07554
Petitioner:
Hanna Waters, Frederick Banks, Women in Hong Kong and others
Respondent:
Michael Phillips, Series of Iran Explosions, Iran Sabotage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. Ponder et al
as 1:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Carella Jones, TBPP, Kourtney Ponder and others
Plaintiff:
William Dexter White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tauno A. Koivisto v. Gill et al
as 2:2020cv03837
Respondent:
James Hills, Teddey, Scott Bruse Jenner and others
Petitioner:
Tauno A. Koivisto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koivisto v. Gill et al
as 3:2020cv02710
Defendant:
Teddey, Zack, Dick Richard Jenumues and others
Plaintiff:
Tauno A. Koivisto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Asemani v. The Islamic Republic of Iran
as 3:2019cv01725
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Asemani v. Islamic Republic of Iran, The
as 1:2019cv00477
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran, The
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
