Cases 11 - 20 of 211
Harris v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00628
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Harris
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Judge W. Gamble
as 3:2023cv04721
Plaintiff:
Haywood J. Harris
Defendant:
Judge W. Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
SHEFFIELD v. BROWN et al
as 5:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L SHEFFIELD
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, LEWIS, UNKNOWN CELL EXTRACTION TEAM #1 - #5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Demers et al
as 2:2023cv01188
Plaintiff:
Carl J Harris and Carl T Harris
Defendant:
Sgt Kyle Demers, CO II Nathan Pach, Cpt Robert Rymarkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Greil
as 2:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Harris
Defendant:
Captain Greil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Bryant J Harris
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Harris
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Phoenix v. Leslie Flemming
as 23-6802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant / Appellee:
LESLIE FLEMMING, Eastern Regional VADOC Administrator, J. MORRISON, Regional Food Service Director, M. ENGALKEY, VADOC Food Service Director and others
SHEFFIELD v. BROWN et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L SHEFFIELD
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, LEWIS, UNKNOWN CELL EXTRACTION TEAM #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Flemming et al
as 3:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Leslie Flemming, J. Morrison, M. Engalkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
