Cases 11 - 20 of 162
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Sweet
as 23-536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Burns, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Robert Berger, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Andrea C. Reischerl, PMHCNS-BC Pyschiatric APRN and others
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Christopher Sweet, Correctional Officer David Evans, Correctional Officer L'T Brian Stadalnik and others
Hess v. Murphy
as 2:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hess
Defendant:
Patrick J Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott Witzke v. Michael Murphy
as 22-2027
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL J. MURPHY, Livingston County, MI Sheriff's Department
Colombe v. Murphy et al
as 9:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Gerald F. Colombe, III and Gerald F. Colombe
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Murphy, John A. Winchell, LT Breyear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillon v. Rosen et al
as 1:2022cv07035
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Dillon
Defendant:
Harvey Rosen, James McQueeney, Esq., Bonnie Wittner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Director of B.O.P. et al
as 1:2022cv02459
Plaintiff:
Darius J. Murphy
Defendant:
Director of B.O.P., Warden of Metropolition Correctional Center, Lt. Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sosa v. Sweet
as 22-526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Burns, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Robert Berger, Psychiatric MD, PhD. and Christina Carole Wright, PSY-APRN
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Christopher Sweet, Correctional Officer David Evans, Correctional Officer L'T Brian Stadalnik and others
Murphy v. Handcock et al
as 4:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Domanick J Murphy
Defendant:
Carla Bayliff, RN Ryan Handcock, FNP A. Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
