Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Johnson v. Hable
as 11-2111
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Arkil Johnson
Defendant:
Michael McGinnis, M. Chorney, J. Marshall and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Timothy Hable, R. Lovejoy, M. Boulas and others
Johnson v. Hable et al
as 11-1335
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Arkil Johnson
Defendant:
Michael McGinnis, M. Chorney, J. Marshall and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Timothy Hable, R. Lovejoy, M. Boulas and others
Marshall v. USA
as 2:2010cv14912
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barnes v. Alve
as 10-3465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant - Appellee:
John Alves, Diane Hersh, Sabrina Vonhagn and others
MARSHALL v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARSHALL
Defendant:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, MAXINE OVERTON, WILLIAM MCCONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00840
Petitioner:
Harry James Marshall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Sheets
as 2:2009cv00510
Petitioner:
James Marshall
Respondent:
Michael Sheets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 1:2009cv00429
Petitioner:
James Marshall
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hearn v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00613
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Hearn
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Unknown Walker, Frederick L. Bearry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mumin v. Ameji et al
as 2:2008cv02236
Plaintiff:
Dukhan . Mumin
Defendant:
Bashir Ameji, Judy Weiss, John Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
