Cases 11 - 20 of 84
S. v. Osceola County, Florida et al
as 6:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
S. S.
Defendant:
Osceola County, Florida, Bryan Holt, Kenneth V. Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIGUEZ v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv00768
Petitioner:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00471
Respondent:
USA
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Easter et al
as 3:2020cv01872
Defendant:
Coutino, Diane Easter, A. Dukane and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vazquez et al v. Shugarts et al
as 3:2020cv01633
Defendant:
Kyle Howles, Jonathan Shugarts, P. Therhildsen and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Vazquez, Grimaldi Quiles, Neysha Vazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2020cv00935
Defendant:
Sharp County Sheriff Department, Mary E Johnson-Rodriguez, Betty Monette and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Neal, Jr II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez v. Faruqui et al
as 8:2020cv01315
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez Marquez
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Bilal Ahmed Faruqui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boone v. Salcedo et al
as 3:2020cv03417
Defendant:
Peter Salcedo, Joseph Westcott, Juan Gamba and others
Plaintiff:
James Leshawn Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Touchette et al
as 5:2019cv00143
Defendant:
Joel Machado and Michael Touchette
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Touchette et al
as 2:2019cv00143
Defendant:
Joel Machado and Michael Touchette
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
