Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Paul v. The Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2012cv02984
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
The Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Western District of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Centaur Holdings Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Standard Parking Corp.
as 1:2012cv09452
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
Standard Parking Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul et al v. Broker South Ag Investments
as 4:2012cv00740
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul and Clearsystems
Defendant:
Broker South Ag Investments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. CLEARSYSTEMS
as 2:2012cv00326
Defendant:
8th Circuit Court of Appeals, JOHN ASHCROFT, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2012cv01872
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Dept of Defense Robert Gates, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Clearsystems
as 3:2012cv03887
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
Clearsystems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffery Lewis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-20709
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFERY PAUL LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lewis v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv02134
Petitioner:
Jeffery Paul Lewis
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
PAUL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00349
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY PAUL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
