Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Smitherman v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Harold Smitherman
Defendant:
Anthony J. Stevenson, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Matthew Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Rasheed v. Newry et al
as 1:2012cv12210
Plaintiff:
Rashad Akeem Rasheed
Defendant:
Carmen Newry, Bartholomew Nelson, Dan Lachance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasheed v. Newry et al
as 1:2012cv12094
Plaintiff:
Rashad Rasheed
Defendant:
Carmen Newry, Bartholomew Nelson, Patricia Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FONTROY v. OWENS et al
as 3:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I
Defendant:
DAVID S OWENS, JOHN DOE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barclay v. New York
as 12-1593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H. Patrick Barclay
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, Thomas Ricks, Superintendent, Captain Racette and others
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 3:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 11-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Prall v. Cococcia
as 11-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tormu E. Prall
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan Cococcia, Mary E. Ahern, Judith E. Wildfeuer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
