Cases 11 - 20 of 21
WATSON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WATSON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, GERALD L. ROZUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07640
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WATSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STANLEY CHMIELEWSKI, RAYMOND D. ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2011cv00603
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watson
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Nail, Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Latimer v. Michael McCall
as 10-7727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL EDWIN LATIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution, KAREN C. RATIGAN, Assistant Attorney General, LARRY R. PATTERSON, Judge and others
Watson Jr. v. Vance Jr.
as 1:2010cv09001
Petitioner:
Joseph Watson Jr.
Respondent:
Cyrus R. Vance Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WATSON v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2010cv04660
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WATSON
Defendant:
RAYMOND D. ROBERTS, JAMES W. CHRISTIES, MATTHEW H. FRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Watson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-2918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, GIBSON, Supt. Somerset, PA, PAUL G. FISHER, Former Kitchen Food Sevice Mananger and others
Watson v. LeClair
as 1:2009cv04870
Petitioner:
Joseph Watson
Respondent:
D.E. LeClair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Watson v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 08-3602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WATSON
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SUPERINTENDENT, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
WATSON v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2008cv01650
Petitioner:
JOSEPH WATSON
Respondent:
ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
