Cases 11 - 20 of 32
US v. Antwan Jackson
as 15-7938
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTWAN LAMAR JACKSON, a/k/a Twan, a/k/a Mey-Mey
JACKSON v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00147
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
ROBERT LAMAR JACKSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00146
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
ROBERT LAMAR JACKSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. USA
as 1:2015cv00386
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LANDIS LAMAR JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00224
Petitioner:
Collin Lamar Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00006
Petitioner:
Terrence Lamar Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv01185
Petitioner:
Terrence Lamar Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. USA
as 7:2012cv02239
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Lamar Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Christopher Jackson v. US
as 11-7652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. Dean et al
as 5:2011cv03942
Plaintiff:
Dentarious Lamar Jackson
Defendant:
Dean, Parker, Morgan County Jail and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
