Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Brewer v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv00488
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Brewer
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Lindermood et al
as 3:2016cv03273
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Cherry Lindermood, Lee Brewer, Brandon Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Fisher et al
as 3:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Brewer
Defendant:
Marshal Fisher, Ron King, Brian Laddner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Tony Parker, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Brewer v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10056
Petitioner - Appellant:
VAN LEE BREWER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Van Brewer v. Lawanda Hightower, et al
as 14-20747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN LEE BREWER
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWANDA HIGHTOWER, Property Officer, JEREMY T. RAYMOND, SOTP Case Manager, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Director of TX Department of Criminal Justice and others
Van Brewer v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20592
Petitioner - Appellant:
VAN LEE BREWER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Brewer v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv02332
Petitioner:
Van Lee Brewer
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewer v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv02962
Petitioner:
Van Lee Brewer
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brewer v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2013cv00438
Petitioner:
Van Lee Brewer
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
