Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 22-10715
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Luis Rodriguez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
RODRIGUEZ PEREZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00430
Petitioner:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ and LUIS A. PEREZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
USA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RODRIGUEZ v. SOLOMAN
as 5:2022cv02647
Petitioner:
SANTOS LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SOLOMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CREWS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH CREWS
Defendant:
MAXIMILLANO TORRES, DAVID TORARCHICK and LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Public Defender Office et al
as 2:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
Luis Rodriguez Aldama
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Smith, Amira D. Fox, Ashley B. Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Pocahontas State Corr. Center-Medical Department
as 7:2021cv00622
Plaintiff:
Carlos Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Pocahontas State Corr. Center-Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. OTTINO et al
as 2:2021cv19210
Plaintiff:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
MISS OTTINO and DOREEN STANZIONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Commonwealth
as 7:2021cv00510
Petitioner:
Carlos Luis Rodriguez
Respondent:
Commonwealth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 4:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER LEO BROWN
Defendant:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ, PAULK and HERNANDEZ-PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. ANGELO et al
as 2:2021cv12801
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY, WARDEN and MICHAEL ANGELO
Petitioner:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
