Cases 11 - 20 of 75
MYERS v. FOLEREZELL
as 2:2023cv04565
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
DR. FOLEREZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Richardson et al
as 9:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Toaisa Richardson and Larry Cracchiolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Michael Myers
as 4:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Freebirds Publishing
as 1:2023cv11574
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Freebirds Publishing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Connecticut Commission of Correction
as 3:2023cv00753
Petitioner:
Michael Myers
Respondent:
Connecticut Commission of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Myers v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 23-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BELLEFONTE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Michael Myers v. Saiqa Mushtaq, et al
as 23-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. SAIQA MUSHTAQ, Psychiatrist -SCI-Camp Hill, MS. GERSON, Psychologist - SCI-Camp Hill, THOMAS, Correction Officer, COI and others
Myers v. Colasante et al
as 9:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Ms. Colasante and James Frey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Houser et al
as 4:2023cv00475
Petitioner:
Michael Myers
Respondent:
Superintendent Houser, District Attorney of Bellefonte and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Michael Meyers, Boogey Man, Gabriel Salas and others
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
