Cases 11 - 20 of 405
Metcalf v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Denzell Magic Metcalf
Defendant:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Brian Robbins, Wendy McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobbs v. McMahon
as 5:2023ct03337
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. USA
as 4:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Michael McMahon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Minor v. Chavez et al
as 1:2023cv13826
Plaintiff:
Bobby Minor
Defendant:
Macario Chavez, Keith Herrera, Jenna McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00402
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diaz-Martinez v. Delgado et al
as 3:2023cv04138
Plaintiff:
Eduardo V. Diaz-Martinez
Defendant:
Mario Delgado, County of San Mateo, Officer Madiera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Sheridan Mental Health Staff et al
as 1:2023cv05521
Plaintiff:
Alen Glenn Marshall
Defendant:
Sheridan Mental Health Staff, Dr. Carr and Dr McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Edwards et al
as 3:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
James Cody McMahon
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Jeff Landry, Stacy Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Campbell
as 3:2023cv00779
Petitioner:
James Cody McMahon
Defendant:
Warden Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARREN v. GOODNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Defendant:
GREG GOODNIGHT, TYLER MOORE, CITY OF KOKOMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
