Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Martinez v. Tomes
as 7:2019cv07651
Petitioner:
Miguel Martinez
Respondent:
Tomes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brimm v. Putnam et al
as 4:2018cv00045
Defendant:
Aldo Magallanes, Ralph Marez, Raul Melero and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brimm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballentine, III v. Collier et al
as 9:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Garland Wayne Ballentine, III
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Stephen Bryant, Kenneth Kent Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Rios et al
as 2:2017cv02445
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
C. Rios, R. Cisneros and Lt. Davidge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Carter v. Brad Livingston, Director, et al
as 17-50947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE L. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JOE GRIMES, Director of Prison and Jail Operations for Region IV and others
Kearey v. Collier et al
as 2:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Mark Jamal Kearey
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Madaline Ortiz, Michael Upshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corson v. Martinez et al
as 2:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Vincent Corson
Defendant:
Miguel Martinez, C Furr, K Putnam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunley v. Martinez
as 5:2016cv01324
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Miguel Martinez
Petitioner:
Trenard Nunley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUJICA v. USA
as 1:2016cv01325
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MIGUEL MARTINEZ MUJICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carter v. Livingstone et al
as 5:2016cv01050
Defendant:
Jorge Alvarez, Terri Y. Driver, William Dubose, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
George L. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
