Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Folsom v. IRS, et al
as 22-6008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN FOLSOM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES, UNKNOWN TRUST FUND OFFICERS, Austin, TX, Kansas City, MO; General Director Unknown or Trust Fund Officer Shawnee OK, in official capacity, NORTH FORK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Labansat v. Bryant
as 6:2021cv00360
Petitioner:
Richard Labansat
Respondent:
Carter County, Carter County, OK and Chris Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OKE v. NAREHOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00261
Plaintiff:
AYODELE OKE
Defendant:
C.O. NAREHOOD, C.O. IRE and C.O. CUMMINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Rohrbough et al
as 5:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
Michael James Petisca Brown
Defendant:
Barry Rohrbough and Stephens County OK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shivers v. Stephens County OK et al
as 5:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Stephens County OK, Kyle Hanson, Noah LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J Shivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk v. Duncan OK City of et al
as 5:2021cv00259
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Trinidad CO Police Department, Lawton OK City of and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Josiah Kirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk v. Stephens County OK et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Stephens County OK, Melody Harper, FNU Herberger and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Josiah Kirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagler v. Mapps et al
as 6:2020cv00500
Plaintiff:
Harold OK Hagler
Defendant:
Dustin Ashworth, Matthew Cooper, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Imo v. Thompson
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
FNU Thompson
Plaintiff:
Umawa Oke Imo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail, State of Oklahoma, Jim E Hamilton Correctional Center in Hodgens OK and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Eugene Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
