Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Muhammad v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00395
Defendant:
Cheeks, Cochrane, Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arturo Cruz v. Sergeant Greer
as 10-6145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTURO CRUZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT GREER, LIEUTENANT D. COLLINS, A. P. HARVEY, Assistant Warden and others
Kostyo v. Harvey et al
as 1:2009cv02509
Plaintiff:
Joel Kostyo
Defendant:
P. Harvey, John Manetti, J. Bunts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Henny v. A. Harvey
as 09-6617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN X. HENNY
Defendant - Appellee:
A. P. HARVEY, B. WATSON, M. HENSLEY and others
Amaya Hugo v. Warden, et al
as 09-1878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMAYA HUGO
Defendant - Appellant:
WARDEN, FSL ELKTON
Defendant - Appellee:
P. HARVEY, Clinic Director, R. MEECE, Physician Assistant, A. ARGABRITE, ARNP and others
Tobias Rush v. B. Watson
as 09-6268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOBIAS RUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
B. WATSON, Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison, R. ROBINSON, C/O Wallens Ridge State Prison, M. HARRIS, Lieutenant, Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
HUGO v. THE WARDEN OF FSL ELKTON et al
as 3:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
AMAYA HUGO
Defendant:
THE WARDEN OF FSL ELKTON, MR. P. HARVEY, MD, MRS. R. MEECE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter v. Watson et al
as 3:2008cv00467
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Watson, R. Mike Garrett, Kim Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paulus Perkins v. Bryan Watson
as 08-6546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAULUS IRVIN PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN WATSON, Warden, A. P. HARVEY, Assistant Warden, OFFICER HENSLEY and others
Perkins v. Watson et al
as 7:2007cv00526
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Bryan Watson, A. P. Harvey, Officer Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
