Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Coleman v. Guy et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Buckner, Bivens and Travis Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Laird et al
as 1:2014cv08544
Defendant:
Paul D. Laird, Leanne LaRina, F. Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrington v. Coleman et al
as 5:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Carrington
Defendant:
Timothy Coleman, Ryan Luza and San Antonio Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Timothy v. Dane County Sheriffs
as 3:2013cv00581
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Dane County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Timothy v. Dane County Sheriff et al
as 3:2013cv00565
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Dane County Sheriff, Foltman, Tillsman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Timothy v. Herman, Robert, et al
as 3:2013cv00566
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe Deputies #1-3 and Robert Herman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
HARRIS v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Defendant:
TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JOHN OLIVER and K. SIERVELD
Plaintiff:
DONTE ROLANDO HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WARREN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv00320
Defendant:
F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JOYCE K. CONLEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE WARREN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Warren v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv02680
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Joyce Zoldak, William G Stewart, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
