Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv11039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Johnson v. Verizon Wireless Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05547
Plaintiff:
Carlos Johnson
Defendant:
Nicholas R Kazlauskas and Verizon Wireless Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chadwick v. Verizon Wireless
as 1:2018cv03183
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless
Plaintiff:
Steve Carl Chadwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Randall (ID 33680) v. Hutchinson Police Department et al
as 5:2018cv03245
Defendant:
Rick Roberts, Patricia Macke Dick, (fnu) Harcrow and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguiar v. Carter
as 18-913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen Aguiar
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Carter, Justin Couture, Jared Hatch and others
Aguiar v. Carter et al
as 2:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Stephen Aguiar
Defendant:
Richard Carter, Justin Couture, Jared Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric B. Saub v. Georgett Phillip
as 17-6604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC B. SAUB
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGETT PHILLIPS, Commonwealth Attorney, Individually and Officially, THOMAS POTTER, Individually and Officially, KRIS COUGHLIN, Individually and Officially and others
Defendant:
DR. ROB ROBINSON, Medical Examiner, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF HAMPTON, JOHN DOE, Detective, Individually and in their official capacities and others
Musaddiq Ahmad v. Norman Glover, et al
as 16-3386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSADDIQ AHMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
NORMAN DOUGLAS GLOVER, DET. MEGAN CONNELL, #182, DET. ROBERT TILL, #149 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
OFFICER CLYDE WASHINGTON, #262
Henson v. Verizon Wireless Inc.
as 5:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Nathan Henson
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
