Cases 11 - 20 of 80,970
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02119
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Zook et al
as 7:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Darren Nathaniel Davis
Defendant:
Warden David Zook, Assistant Warden J. Willington, Director Chadwick S. Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisenby v. Streeval
as 5:2024cv03593
Petitioner:
Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr and Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Potter v. McKenzie et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
James Carr Potter, II
Defendant:
Warden Shawn McKenzie and Commissioner Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv03591
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Washington and Edward L.J. Washington
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections, Warden Kenneth Nelson, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tejada- Gonzalez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Victor Tejada- Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Hooper
as 24-30387
Petitioner:
Brian K. Banks
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Thomas Connelly, Jr. v. Warden Berks County Prison, et al
as 24-2099
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN BERKS COUNTY PRISON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
Gibson v. Bickham
as 24-30389
Petitioner:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Respondent:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
