Cases 11 - 20 of 41
David Meyers v. Ms. Gaul
as 22-6592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. GAUL, CAPTAIN, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Whitlock v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv00639
Petitioner:
Jovan Whitlock
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GAUL
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. GAUL, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramdeo v. Lyn et al
as 5:2022hc02013
Petitioner:
Sonny Austin Ramdeo
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lyn, Warden Stephen Spaulding, Nicole C. English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stafford v. Hoekstra et al
as 3:2021cv00590
Petitioner:
Damon Demond Stafford
Respondent:
Casandra Hoekstra, Warden Stephen Jacobs and Stephen Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Spaulding
as 3:2021cv00726
Petitioner:
Michael Ross
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanders v. Parrott et al
as 3:2020cv00249
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Thaddeus Parson, Sr. Warden Casey A Parrott, Capt. CO A Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucus v. Koenig et al
as 5:2019cv07938
Plaintiff:
Jesse David Lucas and Jesse David Lucus
Defendant:
Julie Garry, Kathleen Allison, Warden Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Lawrenceville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Jeffery Molenhour, Jerry D. Tanner, Lawrenceville Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Mack Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
