Cases 11 - 20 of 10,035
Patterson v. Patterson et al
as 4:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patterson
Defendant:
Kelly Patterson, Keri Street, Terry Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Dixon (Volusia)
as 6:2024cv00830
Petitioner:
Ricky Raynard Kelly
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 1:2024cv00642
Petitioner:
Jonathan Kelly
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024ct03159
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams and Anthony Davis Williams
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly, Ms. Long, John Doe Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety - DPS
as 24-6605
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, -DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, SERGEANT HESTER and others
Bobby Tatum v. Officer Criage, et al
as 24-2084
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TATUM
Defendant:
OFFICER CRIAGE, LIEUTENANT AUSTIN, DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden and others
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Chapa v. Terrebonne Criminal Justice Complex et al
as 2:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Chapa
Defendant:
Terrebonne Criminal Justice Complex, Matthew Martin, Jordan Darcey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanzer v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Khalil T. Hanzer
Defendant:
Brian Emig and Kelly Devinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Criage et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
