Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Mitchell v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Tramane Lopez Mitchell
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, David Shinn, Unknown Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muniz et al v. Zayas
as 2:2021cv02762
Petitioner:
SGT NATHANIEL DAVIS, CO Larry Burnett, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Muniz
Defendant:
Angelo Zayas, MICHAELE FARRELL, CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT JEUDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wunner v. Smith et al
as 7:2021cv01865
Defendant:
Chief H. Smith, Captain J. Ginty, Sergeant C. Zayas and others
Plaintiff:
Jonte Andrew Wunner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Zayas v. Navarro
as 2:2021cv00218
Defendant:
Navarro
Plaintiff:
Julio R. Zayas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zayas-Acosta v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2020cv02793
Petitioner:
Gleen Zayas-Acosta
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Howell v. Zayas et al
as 2:2020cv01929
Defendant:
M. Zayas, A. Konrad, J. Spangler and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zayas-Burgos v. Phelps
as 5:2020cv02323
Petitioner:
Isaac Zayas-Burgos
Respondent:
Warden Shannon Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Privott v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00502
Plaintiff:
Tykeem Privott
Defendant:
Schafer, John Doe, Hightower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Zayas et al
as 8:2020cv00304
Defendant:
Elizabeth A. Kovachevich, Bureau of Prison, Sharon C. Samek and others
Plaintiff:
Alec V. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Mikhail et al
as 1:2020cv00826
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gilmore
Defendant:
Charice L Williams, Ernest J MaMate Grando, Vincent Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
