Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Parker et al v. Zuckerman et al
as 1:2016cv05579
Plaintiff:
Aaron E. Parker and Patricia Mortel
Defendant:
David S. Zuckerman, Thomas P. Zugibe, Dominic A. Crispino, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker et al v. Zuckerman et al
as 1:2016cv05236
Plaintiff:
Aaron E. Parker and Patricia Mortel
Defendant:
Hon. Judge David S. Zuckerman, A.D.A. Dominic Crispino, A.D.A. T. Gaston-Desimone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Zugibe et al
as 7:2016cv04265
Plaintiff:
Aaron E. Parker
Defendant:
District Attorney Thomas P. Zugibe , Assistant District Attorney Maria T Gaston-Desimone , Officer Phillip Fantasia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Fredericks et al
as 1:2015cv09528
Plaintiff:
Kim Vasquez
Defendant:
P.O. John Fredericks, P.O. John Does, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeSimone v. USA
as 3:2015cv00374
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frank DeSimone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Annucci et al
as 9:2014cv00776
Plaintiff:
Erwin Jackson
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Richard DeSimone, Paul J. Chappius, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeSimone v. US
as 13-2198
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROCCO P. DESIMONE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
JOHN AGOSTINI, DAVID M. DURING, ALLAN H. DYER and others
DeSimone v. USA
as 1:2013cv00540
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rocco P. DeSimone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Winfield v. DeRasso
as 13-1752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joaquin R. Winfield
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert DeRasso, Shield #524, John Doe, Shield No.:S154 et.al. of the Suffolk CNTY. Sheriff's Dept., Nicholas DeSimone, Shield # 158 and others
Moore v. Wall, et al
as 12-1941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN L. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, ROBERT M. MCCUTCHEON, KENNETH WALKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
