Cases 21 - 30 of 6,283
Derousseau v. Winter Haven Police Dept. et al
as 8:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Chenel Derousseau
Defendant:
Winter Haven Police Dept., Michael Kelly, Bruce Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Hooper
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Calvin Walker
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branigh v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Leotis B Branigh, III
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officers, Eureka Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Grimes v. Tim Lane
as 24-5456
Petitioner:
ANTHONY THOMAS GRIMES
Respondent:
TIM LANE, Warden
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Scott County et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Scott County, Tim Lane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
