Cases 21 - 30 of 607
ROSARIO-SANCHEZ v. CORPORAL H. SOLIS et al
as 2:2023cv03687
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ROASARIO-SANCHEZ and ANGEL ROSARIO-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CORPORAL H. SOLIS and DR. IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barlean v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kelly J Barlean
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Jesse Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZARAGOSA-SOLIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS, III
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Solis Viveros v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Hames Alexis Solis Viveros
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Solis v. United States America
as 4:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Hilario Solis
Respondent:
Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gaxiola v. Borla et al
as 3:2023cv02196
Plaintiff:
Joseph Emmanuel Gaxiola
Defendant:
E. Borla, D. Bright, Qingbo Sui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01270
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roque Solis v. Raymond Madden
as 23-55334
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROQUE SOLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOLIS v. CONYERS et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
YONI SOLIS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CONYERS, THOMAS SOLOMON, J. ERNEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
