Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 43
King v. Salmonson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2018cv00027
Respondent: James Salmonson
Petitioner: Christopher King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. King
as 2:2017cv12767
Plaintiff: Christopher King
Defendant: King
Elijah Ford v. Michael Kennerly, et al
as 17-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELIJAH M. FORD
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL C. KENNERLY, Physician Assistant, ROGER A. GERLACH, Medical Doctor, RICHARD CZOP, Medical Doctor and others
Robert Annabel, II v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2532
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 16-2398
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL H. HEYNS, CHRISTOPHER KING, AARON RUTGERS and others
King v. Tripp et al
as 5:2016hc02213
Petitioner: Christopher King
Respondent: Brick Tripp and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Spring Valley Police Dept. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv06315
Plaintiff: James Christopher King
Defendant: Spring Valley Police Dept., Kevin Graiani, David Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00942
Petitioner: Christopher King
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
King v. USA
as 2:2016cv12272
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Daron Christopher King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Annabel #414234 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00543
Plaintiff: Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Aramark Corporation, Inc., Daniel Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?