Cases 21 - 30 of 33
RICKARD v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2019cv00091
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE, MAJOR WADE HARRIS, CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN RICKARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHOLSTON v. BALL et al
as 5:2019cv00380
Defendant:
CERT MEMBER WILLIE GAINES, UNIT MANAGER GEORGE BALL, PRISON GUARD BENTLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DEANTE GHOLSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Scott, et al
as 3:2019cv00348
Defendant:
Captain Scott, Jefferson County Sheriff's Office, Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Neal Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hitner v. John Doe I et al
as 1:2018cv02008
Defendant:
Captain Scott Downs, John Doe II and John Doe I
Plaintiff:
Clinton Hitner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saddozai v. Nelson et al
as 5:2018cv04492
Defendant:
Captain Scott Kirkpatrick, Sheriff Carlos Bolanos, Peter Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Shikeb Saddozai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saddozai v. Bolanos et al
as 5:2018cv04047
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services, Captain Scott Kirkpatrick, Sheriff Carlos Bolanos and others
Plaintiff:
Shikeb Saddozai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mcneill v. Allen
as 1:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kendric Demarcus Mcneill
Defendant:
Captain Scott Allen
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Octavio Romero v. State of California et al
as 5:2012cv00567
Respondent:
Judge Larry R Balderama, Det Scott Connon, Corpora FICTA Employees and others
Petitioner:
Octavio Romero
Harry Maddox, III v. Bonnie Case, et al
as 12-1669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry Maddox, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Bonnie E. Case, Captain, Scott County Jail, Missy Dellwo, RN, Scott County Jail, Barbra Winterfeldt, Program Director, Scott County Jail and others
West v. Captain Scott, et al
as 10-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN SCOTT, Sterling Corrections, JOANN STOCK, Sterling Medical, MR. ESTEP, CMRC Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
