Cases 21 - 30 of 108
Lytle v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv02277
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Lytle
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Christopher Zych, Curtis Mabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv12367
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Lytle v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv01784
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Lytle
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Christopher Zych, Curtis Mabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016ct03086
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Logan
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Warden Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Charles Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 4:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Keelan Harris
Defendant:
United States of America, Loretta E. Lynch, Charles Samuel, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
Fed. Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Jr. and Anthony Osagie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckwith v. Cavanaugh et al
as 3:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Beckwith
Defendant:
William Cavanaugh, L.T. Oddo and Charles Samuel, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vitrano v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Vitrano
Defendant:
Charles Samuels , Jr., J.F. Caraway, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vitrano v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas Phillip Vitrano
Defendant:
Charles Samuels , Jr., J.F. Caraway, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
