Cases 21 - 30 of 390
DRUMMOND v. LIM et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W DRUMMOND
Defendant:
C LIM, OFFICER JACKSON, LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Defendant:
William Gitterre, Ely State Prison, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Marcell Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearring v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Frank Hearring
Defendant:
William Gittere, Tasheena Cooke, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chiwanga v. Drummond
as 23-5136
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKSON PETER CHIWANGA
Respondent / Appellee:
GENTNER F. DRUMMOND, Oklahoma Attorney General
IN RE: DRUMMOND
as 2:2023cv04768
In Re:
RONALD R. DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: DRUMMOND
as 2:2023cv04767
In Re:
RONALD R. DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Defendant:
WARDEN J. HUTCHINSON, FCI McKEAN FACILITIES DEPARTMENT HEAD, COMPOUND SUPERVISING OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemmons v. Melody et al
as 4:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Tobin Don Lemmons
Defendant:
Nurse Melody, Gentner Drummond, Administrative Head of State Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Vital Core Strategies
as 23-60599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob Blair Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Vital Core Strategies, Mike Ezell, Sheriff, individual and official capacity, Tyrone Nelson, Captain, individual and official capacity and others
Wright v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00385
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wright
Respondent:
Gentre Drummond and Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
