Cases 21 - 30 of 2,855
Landis v. Krabbenhoft
as 1:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Douglas E. Landis
Respondent:
Dave Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAPHOOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
DAVE GAPHOOR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Jacobs v. Marion Correctional Institution, et al
as 24-3092
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Defendant:
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY and others
Williams v. Shroader et al
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Terrence Williams
Defendant:
Nlcholas Shroader, Matthew Gallacier, Adam Linder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. The Estate of Sgt. Davis et al
as 7:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Powell
Defendant:
Sgt. Davis, Officer Loggin, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnnie Russell v. Ryan Comstock, et al
as 24-1100
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE E. RUSSELL
Defendant:
RYAN COMSTOCK, Sgt. #1205, COLIN POWELL, #6694 and DAVE WOHLGEMUTH, Lt. #1907
Cain v. Cross et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Ofc Cross, Calloway County, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Hawthorne v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Dave C Hawthorne, Jr
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cobble, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
