Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Gonzales v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Defendant:
Ross Sanchez, Bernalillo County District Attorney's Office and Daniel Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Gomez v. Arturo Koenig, et al
as 14-56409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH J. GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTURO KOENIG, ZACHARY JORDAN, ISMAEL DAVID GONZALES and others
Prejean v. Daniels et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
David J Prejean
Defendant:
Charles A Daniels, David Gonzales, Jr, Rebecca Nicholas Mallet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golden v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Brent Golden
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Pottawatomie County of, David Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Hinzo v. State of N.M. Dept. of Corr., et al
as 13-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JAMES HINZO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE TAPIA, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Ybarra v. McLaws et al
as 2:2012cv02594
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales Ybarra
Defendant:
Devon McLaws, David Aarron Dunn, Adam P Walicke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman Wroclawski v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-15113
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROMAN WROCLAWSKI
Respondent - Appellee:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, United States Secretary of State, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, DAVID GONZALES, United States Marshall, District of Arizona and others
Gonzales v. Derby et al
as 1:2011cv11651
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Defendant:
Paul M Derby and Elsa Nearing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golden v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
Brent Golden
Defendant:
David Gonzales and Russ Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
