Cases 21 - 30 of 3,719
Gomez Munoz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00811
Petitioner:
Francisco Antonio Gomez Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ortiz v. Diaz et al
as 5:2024cv03082
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ortiz
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olvera-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Olvera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cano v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Francisco Magallon Cano
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guan v. County of San Fracisco Magistrate Company et al
as 3:2024cv02896
Plaintiff:
Min Jian Guan
Defendant:
County of San Fracisco Magistrate Company and San Francisco County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loera #154976 v. Unknown Party
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Francisco Loera
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olvera-Galvan v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Olvera-Galvan
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Francisco Ruiz, Jr. v. Rodney Reynolds
as 24-1782
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ RUIZ, JR.
Defendant:
RODNEY REYNOLDS
Valencia v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Francisco Shanchez Valencia and Francisco Sanchez Valencia
Defendant:
Unknown Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
