Cases 21 - 30 of 1,024
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Raymond Gill
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cousins v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ross Cousins
Defendant:
Col. Eric Young, Sgt. Caplinger, Officer O. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bertolo (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02763
Defendant:
Sean Burrows, Dean Williams, Andre Moses Stancil and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Bertolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILL v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. (FCSD) et al
as 1:2023cv01766
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MATTHEW GILL
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. (FCSD), CONNERSVILLE POLICE DEPT. (CPD), CLINT BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Moody et al
as 2:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry and Mosheh Ben Israel
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ricky Dixion, Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Gill v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 23-13117
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
