Cases 21 - 30 of 1,992
Walker v. Henry
as 6:2024cv06048
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Walker, III
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry and Wellpath LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniel Le Clerc, Sr. v. John Guy, et al
as 24-11047
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LE CLERC, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN I. GUY and MARK R. MILLER
Leonard v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00734
Petitioner:
Guy Leonard, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. USA
as 3:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
Guy Leonard, Jr
Garnishee:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stovall v. Henry
as 6:2024cv06035
Plaintiff:
Vandy D. Stovall and Black
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bicking v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Guy Bicking
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marc Bakambia v. Stephen Craane, et al
as 24-1489
Plaintiff:
Marc Amouri Bakambia
Defendant:
Stephen Craane, M.D.; in their individual and official capacities, Luke DeHaan, P.T.; in their individual and official capacities, Louis Shicker, M.D.; in their individual and official capacities and others
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 6:2024cv06023
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Dr Guy Henry and Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Guy Henry and Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
