Cases 21 - 30 of 209
Tommy Keeton v. Jeff Lynch, et al
as 22-16313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY ROY KEETON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF LYNCH, RILEGIL, MOORE and others
Hammons v. Charles et al
as 5:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent:
Samuels E. Charles, Jr, Gete Linda, McCaffrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hammons v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00164
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hammon v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00410
Petitioner:
Glen Dale Hammon
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Megginson v. Morales et al
as 1:2022cv03815
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Megginson
Defendant:
ESH ADW Morales, ESH ADW Green, ESH Kanol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Precythe et al
as 5:2022cv06047
Plaintiff:
Quinton Hammons
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe and Rodrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Fairley et al
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hammons
Defendant:
Bobby C. Fairley, Mental Health Dept., George County Regional Correctional Facility, Hospital and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Fairley et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hammons
Defendant:
Bobby C. Fairley, Burl Cain, State Parole Board Jackson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Ankenbrandt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Bowman
Defendant:
Ankenbrandt, Ahlm, Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carver v. Driscoll
as 6:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Rodney L. Carver
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Terry Tuggle, Mr. Britt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
