Cases 21 - 30 of 656
Boyd v. Hancock State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Hancock State Prison and Officer Reinfroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
TRAVON COOPER
Respondent:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNETT v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
RANDY DEWAYNE BARNETT
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON and DOCTOR CARL LIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hankins v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Hankins
Defendant:
Sacramento County, Gregory Sokolov, Dr. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Hancock State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Barnett
Defendant:
Hancock State Prison and Dr. Carl Lift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briscoe v. Director of the MDOC et al
as 4:2023cv01519
Plaintiff:
Alan Briscoe
Defendant:
Director of the MDOC and Unknown Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torrence Sanders v. Hancock SP Warden
as 23-13885
Petitioner / Appellant:
TORRENCE SANDERS
Respondent / Appellee:
HANCOCK SP WARDEN and WARDEN
Saleem Williams v. Hancock SP Warden
as 23-13787
Petitioner / Appellant:
SALEEM D. WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
HANCOCK SP WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
