Cases 21 - 30 of 863
Ross v. Unidentified U. S. Marshal(s) et al
as 1:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner Ross
Defendant:
Unidentified U. S. Marshal(s), Allen, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gregory v. Chamness et al
as 3:2013cv01124
Plaintiff:
Johnny Brett Gregory
Defendant:
Tony Chamness, Jeff Baney, Weasel Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nosair v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
El-Sayyid Nosair
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Leslie Smith, D Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amawi v. Walton et al
as 3:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Zaki Amawi
Defendant:
J. S. Walton, D Scott Dodrill, Brian K Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Samuels Jr et al
as 1:2013cv02521
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
Charles Samuels Jr, III, M D Carvajal, R Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DuMonde v. Drew et al
as 1:2013cv02050
Petitioner:
Daniel L. DuMonde
Respondent:
Darlene Drew, Gladney and Harley Lappin
Benjamin Roark v. Regina Flannery, et al
as 13-40598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN A. ROARK
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIVIDUALS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORMER AND CURRENT, ERIC HOLDER, ALBERTO GONZALES, Former United States Attorney General and others
Donald Jenkins v. Simmon
as 13-6656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD H. JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. SIMMONS, Food Service Administrator and MR. SIMON, Cook Forman
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN, Director
Stine v. Lappin, et al
as 13-1164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director B.O.P., MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director B.O.P. and RON WILEY, Warden ADX Supermax
David Zebrowski v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-60196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ZEBROWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, R E HOLT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
