Cases 21 - 30 of 2,725
Ji'Haad Harrison v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 24-1587
Plaintiff:
JI'HAAD AMORE HARRISON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MERCER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Clum v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
David Clum, Jr.
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Elnour v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02284
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elnour
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Washington County et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Philemon Alexander
Defendant:
Washington County, B. Jenkins, Ruipert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Ortega v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02185
Petitioner:
Hernan Ramirez-Ortega
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hardimon v. Thielan et al
as 3:2024cv50157
Plaintiff:
Harrison J Hardimon
Defendant:
Nurse Thielan and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Terrell v. Warden Dooly State Prison, et al
as 24-10577
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN DOOLY STATE PRISON, PAUL, LUCAS and others
Whitten v. The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
as 2:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Landon Whitten
Defendant:
The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels and Remo H Daniels
Defendant:
Jerome G Bailey, Sgt Nelson, CO Pach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lizana v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Lizana
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Troy Peterson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
