Cases 21 - 30 of 785
Smith v. Bailey et al.
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Smith
Defendant:
Sam Bailey, Holmes County Sheriff's Office Investigators, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krieg v. Blake
as 24-40048
Plaintiff:
William Henry Krieg
Defendant:
James E. Blake, Chibuike M. Omwuka, Fernater J. Smith and others
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Dayomic J. Smith
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith #340475 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Paris J. Smith #340475
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TLUSTY v. SWAIN et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TLUSTY and ROBERT J TLUSTY
Defendant:
D SWAIN, K DAVIS, J ELLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Jeb Bush, et al
as 23-14207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEB BUSH, KEN MASCARA, LIEUTENANT HASILEY and others
Smith v. Fritter et al
as 3:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Bradley Smith and Bradley J Smith
Defendant:
Sherry Fritter, M Hubbard, Wexford of Indiana, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Blake Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Wills, Lewey, Lt. Royster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00743
Petitioner:
Dayomic J. Smith
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
JASON J SMITH
Defendant:
TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA and COUNTY LEON FLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
