Cases 21 - 30 of 127
Poling v. Cumberland County Detention Center
as 5:2023ct03186
Petitioner:
Zachary Nathaniel Poling
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Cumberland County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Charlie Egbert Cain, Brad Donahue, Taimon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd Hammond v. James Green
as 23-5502
Petitioner / Appellant:
LLOYD HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM LANE, Warden, Green River Correctional Complex and JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Snell v. Green
as 2:2023cv00047
Petitioner:
Curtis Snell
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noonan v. Green
as 5:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
James J. Noonan and James Blair, Jr.
Respondent:
James D. Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dante' Stone v. James Green
as 23-5182
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden
Green v. Warden Parcker
as 4:2023cv00577
Petitioner:
James Daniel Green
Respondent:
Warden Parcker and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Weinmann et al
as 2:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
James D Green
Defendant:
HSUM Weinmann, Nurse Brian, Jodi Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dante' Stone v. James Green, et al
as 23-5031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, JAMES WHITT, Deputy Warden, PAUL CROUCH, Deputy Warden and others
James Green v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 22-16926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES HENRY GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMEO ARANAS, RENE BAKER, JAMES COX and others
Harris v. Green
as 2:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
Carlos Harris
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
