Cases 21 - 30 of 284
Michael Rankins v. Michael Carvajal
as 22-6322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of Bureau of Prisons, J.C. PETRUCC, Regional Director, JOHN OR JANE DOE, Food Service Administrator and others
Young v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Trevor L Young, Jr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail and CO Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Trevor L Young, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Jones, CO Martin, Earnell Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOGAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. LOGAN, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR, DAVID S. OWENS and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOMASSINI v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
RUBEN TOMASSINI
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID OWENS and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGOS v. HEWETT et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
AGUSTIN BURGOS and AGUSTIN JR BURGOS
Defendant:
G HEWETT, J HOLDEN, S WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bria L. Young
Defendant:
Walker, K. Perkins, L. Currin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vance v. Young
as 5:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
Terrence R. Vance
Respondent:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nguyen v. Young
as 5:2021cv00676
Petitioner:
Phong Nguyen
Defendant:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GLOVER v. OWENS et al
as 1:2021cv20714
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANTHONY GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
