Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 48
MARSHALL v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL JAIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv05958
Plaintiff: MARK LEE MARSHALL
Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Bryant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5150
Petitioner - Appellant: MARK LEE WOLFE
Respondent - Appellee: JASON BRYANT, Warden
Fain v. Premo
as 6:2016cv00643
Petitioner: Mark Lee Fain
Respondent: Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pauler v. Crosen et al
as 3:2016cv00140
Plaintiff: Mark Lee Pauler
Defendant: Gordon Crosen, Mr. Atkins and Fred Kite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Uttecht We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05928
Petitioner: Mark Lee Miller
Respondent: Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SEAGRAVES v. TREACHLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv07801
Plaintiff: MARK LEE SEAGRAVES
Defendant: DAVID TREACHLER, RAYMOND SKRADZINSKI, SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Adams v. Michael Gottlieb et al
as 2:2015cv04809
Plaintiff: Paul Adams
Defendant: Does, Peggy Fiderio, Peggy Fiderio and others
Wolfe v. State of Oklahoma et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00151
Petitioner: Mark Lee Wolfe
Respondent: State of Oklahoma and Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolfe v. State of Oklahoma et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00104
Petitioner: Mark Lee Wolfe
Respondent: State of Oklahoma and Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Cummings v. John Katavich
as 14-55032
Petitioner - Appellant: MARK LEE CUMMINGS
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN N. KATAVICH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?