Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Shaw v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice- Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID) et al
as 4:2011cv01448
Plaintiff:
Oscar L Shaw
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice- Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID), Rick Thaler, David Sweetin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Gurule v. City of Roseburg, Oregon, et al
as 09-35683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD EVERETT LEE GURULE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ROSEBURG, OREGON, STATE OF OREGON, JACK L. BANTA, Douglas County, D.A. and others
Tyus v. Bond et al
as 1:2008cv01242
Plaintiff:
Keith Labrandy Tyus
Defendant:
Joe Bond, Melvin Bond, Elma Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. Smith, et al
as 08-41000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT GREGORY MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
J B SMITH, MARK MACHINTOSH and MARIE TAYLOR
Moore v. Smith, et al
as 08-40998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT GREGORY MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
J B SMITH, MARK MACHINTOSH and MARIE TAYLOR
Moore v. Smith, et al
as 08-40742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT GREGORY MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
J B SMITH, MARK MACHINTOSH and MARIE TAYLOR
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv00852
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, Russell D Feingold, Dave Obey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Smith et al
as 6:2007cv00323
Plaintiff:
Brent Gregory Moore
Defendant:
J B Smith, Mark Machintosh and Marie Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. Bond et al
as 1:2007cv01094
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric McFarland
Defendant:
Joe Thomas Bond, Melvin Bond, Bobbie Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ron Harris
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Mary Taylor and Gloria Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
