Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Griggs v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2019cv01200
Plaintiff:
Travis Griggs
Defendant:
Jeremy Bellmon, Jermaine Bates, Jeremy Pelzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Mitchum et al
as 5:2018cv01021
Defendant:
Jimmy Patrick, Dewayne Estes, Billy Mitchum and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Pescador et al
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
Chris Sanchez
Defendant:
Juan Pescador, Benjamin Arguello, Mike Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Jones v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Ofc, et al
as 17-17306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. JONES, AKA Mike Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and JEANINE TARANTINO, Prosecuting Attorney at Maricopa County Attorney's Office
Nalty v. Krieger et al
as 1:2017cv02205
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Marcia Smith Krieger, R. Brooke Jackson, Christine M. Arguello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #229418 v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02848
Plaintiff:
Mike Jones
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Jeanine Tarantino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #229418 v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2017cv02644
Petitioner:
Mike Jones
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeJesus-Brito v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2017cv01472
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rafael DeJesus-Brito
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Facility, Chuck Wright, Allen Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Morriss et al
as 3:2017cv00811
Plaintiff:
David Gardner
Defendant:
Dent Morriss, Mike Jones, Glenn Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Texas Tech Mental-Medical Services et al
as 2:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Chris Wooten
Defendant:
Texas Tech Mental-Medical Services, Mike Jones, NFN Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
