Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Fisher v. Brown et al
as 5:2013cv02569
Plaintiff:
Gary Francis Fisher
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Gipson, E. Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duane Watson v. David Basse, et al
as 13-10099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE LYNN WATSON, also known as Duane Watson
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BASSE, Doctor, JOSEPHINE ABERNATHY, Director of Nurses, K. WALLACE, FHA Supervisor of Medical Staff and others
Watson v. Basse et al
as 2:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Duane Lynn Watson
Defendant:
David Ryan Basse, Josephine Abernathy, K Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hoskins v. US
as 12-6954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. HOSKINS, NOVELLA L. RIVERA BURRELL, JAH'VAUGHN M. BURRELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Patrick Howard v. TDCJ McConnell Unit, et al
as 12-40268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK JAMES HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
GUTIERREZ, Warden, N. JACKSON, Warden, E CASTRO, Major and others
Hoskins et al v. United States et al
as 5:2012ct03012
Plaintiff:
David A. Hoskins, Novella L. Rivera Burrell, Jah'vaughn M. Burrell and others
Defendant:
. United States, North Carolina and U.S. Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. Davis et al
as 2:2011cv00348
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Dickey
Respondent:
Davis, C Monroe, N. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Brown v. Cassim, et al
as 11-56654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CASSIM, Physician, JOHNSON, MTA, N. JACKSON, care of Mrs care of Macias and others
Jackson v. Hinkle
as 2:2010cv00569
Petitioner:
Kevin N. Jackson
Respondent:
George M. Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Anthony Jackson
as 10-3727
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY N. JACKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
