Cases 21 - 30 of 258
Newkirk v. USA
as 4:2023cv01069
Petitioner:
Justin Newkirk
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Newkirk v. Director of Dept. Corrections
as 3:2023cv00636
Petitioner:
Kenneth Newkirk
Respondent:
Director of Dept. Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newkirk v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Lt. KM Fleming, Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Clarke, et al
as 7:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Hernandez, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Wexford et al
as 3:2023cv00607
Defendant:
Wexford, Centurion, Corizon and others
Plaintiff:
DeJuan Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Newkirk, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Schneider et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Defendant:
Hasza, J Schneider, D Buss and others
Plaintiff:
Garganus Moore
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Drogosz v. Mark Newkirk, et al
as 23-2335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DROGOSZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NEWKIRK and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Nasiruddin v. Camaron et al
as 1:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Mujahid Nasiruddin
Defendant:
Captain Camaron, Lt. Patrick, Correctional Officer Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Crain v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Durell T Crain
Defendant:
Robert E Carter, Jr, Christina Reagle, Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
