Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 218
Patton v. Westwego City
as 22-30584
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Wesley Patton, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Westwego City, Kenner City, Jefferson Parish and others
Smith v. Edwards, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00573
Plaintiff: ALEX A., by and through his guardian, Molly Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Molly Smith
Defendant: GOVERNOR JON BEL EDWARDS, in his official capacity as Governor of Louisiana, WILLIAM SOMMERS, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the Office of Juvenile Justice, JAMES M. LEBLANC, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norman v. Carr
as 22-10839
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alexis C. Norman, and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Michael Carr, Warden, FMC Carswell and Charles Langham, Medical Director, FMC Carswell
musa al-gamar al mu'min v. Bosch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2021cv02464
Plaintiff: D. Thomas, Musa Al-Gamar Al-Mu'Min For his estate, himself and others similarly situated doing business as Pharaoh El-Forever Left-I; Amen El, Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i; Amen El doing business as Pharaoh El-Forever Left-I; Amen El also known as musa al-gamar al mu'min and others
Defendant: United States of America, State of Minnesota, Vatican Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Althouse v. USA
as 22-10351
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kevin R. Althouse, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Mentally Disabled and or Special Needs Offenders
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, State of Texas, County of Dallas, Texas and others
Brownlee v. Mgmt and Training
as 22-10482
Plaintiff / Appellant: Aaron Brownlee, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Management and Training Corporation and Grady Wallace, In His Official and Personal Capacity
Knight v. New York State Department of C
as 22-964
Plaintiff / Appellee: Hugh Knight, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Shannon Dickinson, on behalf of themselves and all otehrs similarly situated
Plaintiff: Wayne Stewart, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections, a public entity, Carl Koenigsmann, MD, Susan Mueller, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant: Chung Lee, MD and Albert Acrish, NP
Dimartino v. Sage
as 22-652
Petitioner / Appellant: Kenneth Pelletier, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs
Petitioner: Kevin DiMartino, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, Michael Milchin, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, Steven Pagartanis, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs and others
Respondent: D. Easter, Warden FCI Danbury, Acting Warden of FCI Danbury, Current Unknown, FCI Danbury, Medical Staff and others
Respondent / Appellee: Acting Warden Jessica Sage
Jeffrey Nielsen, et al v. David Shinn
as 22-15302
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFREY NIELSEN, BRIAN BOUDREAU, on behalf of themsleves and all others similarly situated and ARIZONA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, as an organization and on behalf of its members
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry, in his official capacity
Kevin Karsjens, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-1459
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kevin Scott Karsjens, and all others similarly situated, Kevin John DeVillion, and all others similarly situated, Peter Gerard Lonergan, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jodi Harpstead, Kevin Moser, in their individual and official capacities, Peter Puffer and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?