Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Nicholas Patrick v. West Justice Center et al
as 8:2016cv00827
Defendant:
John Adams, John Adams, Madeline Berkley and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Patrick
Robinson v. Black and Pink et al
as 1:2016cv00390
Defendant:
Black and Pink, Ellis County Clerk Office, Fontana Distribution and others
Plaintiff:
Dayrin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. 1-800-777-7774 et al
as 3:2015cv00726
Defendant:
1-800-225-2525, 1-800-4-Waters, 1-800-777-0777 and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald, et al v. Higgs, Jr. et al
as 3:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Gerald, Rashid Jalal, Fitzroy Pink and others
Defendant:
Joseph A. Higgs, Jr., Ombudsman and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pink v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
Dwight G. Pink
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, Jon Brighthaupt, Lauren Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pink v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv00995
Plaintiff:
Dwight G. Pink
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, Jon Brighthaupt, Lauren Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pink v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv00993
Plaintiff:
Dwight G. Pink
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, Jon Brighthaupt, Kimberly J. Weir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pink v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv00994
Plaintiff:
Dwight G. Pink
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, Jon Brighthaupt, Lauren Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billy Hardin v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10586
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY PINK HARDIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Pozo v. Annucci et al
as 9:2013cv00754
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pozo
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fischer, Waninges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
