Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Hicks v. Roger et al
as 3:2011cv00185
Defendant:
Atty Gen Catherine Masto Cortez, Jim Gibbons, Jack Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Roger et al
as 2:2011cv00104
Defendant:
Jim Gibbons, David Roger, Jack Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hicks v. Johnson
as 3:2009cv00413
Petitioner:
Robert Neal Hicks
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00250
Petitioner:
Robert Neal Hicks
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Meko et al
as 0:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Hicks
Defendant:
Joseph Meko, Denise Black and Scott Haas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hicks v. STATE OF WISCONSIN
as 3:2008cv00131
Petitioner:
Robert John Hicks
Respondent:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thunderhorse, et al v. Owens, et al
as 07-51148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY ANTHONY BACA, ROBERT ALLEN HICKS, CARL ALBERT MARLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RISSI L OWENS, In her official capacity as member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, JOSE ALISEDA, JR., In his official capacity as member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, CHARLES AYCOCK, In his official capacity as member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Hicks v. Bartlett
as 1:2007cv00746
Petitioner:
Robert B, Hicks
Respondent:
James Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Dormire
as 4:2007cv00027
Petitioner:
Robert A Hicks
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
