Cases 21 - 30 of 204
(PC) Hill v. Pfeifer et al
as 1:2019cv01221
Defendant:
K Cater, C. Pfeifer, B. Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Taft L Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAFT v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2019cv03731
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
COREY TAFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAFT v. GEROGE W HILL
as 2:2019cv03721
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND TAFT, III
Defendant:
GEROGE W HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DuPree Lamont Adkins v. J. Gastelo et al
as 5:2019cv01137
Defendant:
K. Cox, R. Ochoa, M. Grijava and others
Plaintiff:
DuPree Lamont Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loya v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01646
Defendant:
JEWAHER ABUBAKER, MICHAEL SMITH, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOYA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Taft v. USA
as 1:2019cv00393
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shawn Taft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Little v. Soulia et al
as 9:2019cv00263
Plaintiff:
Charles Little, Clifton Little and Clifton X
Defendant:
J. LaPorte, Trevar A. Soulia, John Doe #5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burtton v. USA
as 8:2019cv00058
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Taft Burtton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bowens v. Bombardier et al
as 9:2018cv01377
Defendant:
Gregory Archer, Daniel J. Bombardier, Matthew A. Lafountain and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Bowens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
